{"id":"W1969557628","doi":"10.1109/pmaps.2010.5528975","title":"Wind power planning and operating capacity credit assessment","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Power System Reliability and Maintenance","field":"Engineering","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Wind power; Context (archaeology); Wind speed; Capacity planning; Electric power system; Nameplate capacity; Computer science; Reliability engineering; Environmental science; Automotive engineering; Power (physics); Engineering; Meteorology; Electrical engineering; Electricity generation; Operations management; Geography; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002423827,0.00009211058,0.0001136973,0.00002022803,0.00005848296,0.00005684777,0.00006474515,0.00006686406,0.0001394212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003047269,0.00007705396,0.00001592291,0.00003469854,0.00003081812,0.0001432538,0.00002544296,0.0002644063,0.000009184175],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001637854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008785763,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002336864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002031661,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994841,0.000008815886,0.0001296757,0.0001232711,0.00008015281,0.0001740369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997047,0.00003528173,0.00000977645,0.0001562675,0.00002214528,0.00007183048],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008673496,0.0001382321,0.1301054,0.0008361696,0.0002757747,0.00007081144,0.009809336,0.02090198,0.7406149,0.06486001,0.03027437,0.002104369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002166638,0.0002768755,0.4794357,0.0002533249,0.00008701697,0.0003647434,0.002902855,0.2874515,0.03997859,0.001532006,0.1832205,0.002330222],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9002131,0.00002879065,0.0115793,0.00007795078,0.0008833725,0.00009858167,0.000003954368,0.0002038565,0.08691116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928652,8.537153e-7,0.006779075,0.00005514739,0.0000565648,0.000004412466,7.484585e-7,0.00001087868,0.0002270875],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7006363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3142169,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009859776586768954,"score_gpt":0.2322689702919521,"score_spread":0.2224091937051832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}