{"id":"W1969568117","doi":"10.1007/s10661-013-3191-6","title":"Assessment of private economic benefits and positive environmental externalities of tea plantation in China","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Externality; China; Subsidy; Agricultural economics; Total economic value; Natural resource economics; Ecosystem services; Business; Environmental protection; Economics; Geography; Ecosystem; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001070831,0.0003396398,0.0003985021,0.001215023,0.0005296918,0.001146183,0.0005774912,0.0005257222,0.001003427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001443446,0.000251998,0.0007520173,0.001237279,0.0008935078,0.001065112,0.0009005037,0.0004223876,0.00005962642],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003865339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002265759,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07743836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1016347,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994886,0.0001147039,0.00003067292,0.00008851413,0.0001080066,0.0001696426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982876,0.0004523677,0.0005771014,0.00009206087,0.0002702258,0.0003205879],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003882445,0.000205351,0.9533549,0.00005338592,0.00028962,0.001141072,0.0004692162,0.03066099,0.001801293,0.003746725,0.0005069893,0.007382195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003053401,0.0001007044,0.9424551,0.00000893249,0.0001515591,0.0001073427,0.001372357,0.05322701,0.0004597311,0.001586965,0.0004691795,0.00003061743],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992322,0.00004297815,0.0001335995,0.00008425795,0.000001257682,0.00000336387,0.00008488398,0.000002369768,0.0004151835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996935,0.00002758706,0.00002787947,0.000004652241,0.000001751201,0.00000143937,0.00006372498,4.153122e-7,0.0001789508],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07743836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1539752,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02560931347971802,"score_gpt":0.2261736102872982,"score_spread":0.2005642968075802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}