{"id":"W1969590427","doi":"10.1139/x03-173","title":"Estimation of the physical wood properties of green <i>Pinus taeda</i> radial samples by near infrared spectroscopy","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Wood Treatment and Properties","field":"Engineering","cited_by":122,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Loblolly pine; Pinus <genus>; Water content; Near-infrared spectroscopy; Spectroscopy; Moisture; Stiffness; Correlation coefficient; Environmental science; Materials science; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Chemistry; Botany; Mathematics; Composite material; Geology; Physics; Chromatography; Optics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001925208,0.000566823,0.0001740474,0.0007776089,0.0002086078,0.0002621516,0.000261939,0.0001906951,0.0005020988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002457077,0.0002519841,0.0001891984,0.0003360528,0.0001713085,0.0002005558,0.0001360134,0.0002616564,0.0002464219],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001772058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000760575,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005584828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009523484,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999185,0.000009579511,0.000003791092,0.00003076707,0.0000274755,0.000009983932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999835,0.00002820621,0.00004465103,0.0000148727,0.00005535404,0.00002191166],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001180747,0.00004296124,0.03018315,0.00006468353,0.00002915679,0.0000861927,0.00008663318,0.0005818582,0.9592046,0.00003124365,0.00005219587,0.009519245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001019243,0.000434507,0.8458854,0.00001545471,0.00006994247,0.0003579605,0.0002206751,0.003519337,0.1481561,0.00008021629,0.001220397,0.00002989373],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946167,0.0001899531,0.004312996,0.00000374418,0.000002499469,0.00002447102,0.0003312812,0.00007053358,0.0004478838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917164,0.0001920061,0.006794789,0.00002226669,0.000002175892,0.00004430714,0.0007696847,0.00002426257,0.0004341943],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005584828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01110464,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03506500107568459,"score_gpt":0.2529759810685219,"score_spread":0.2179109799928373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}