{"id":"W1969646077","doi":"10.2105/ajph.2012.300917","title":"Impact Evaluation of a Public Bicycle Share Program on Cycling: A Case Example of BIXI in Montreal, Quebec","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Public Health","topic":"Urban Transport and Accessibility","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Cycling; Confidence interval; Poison control; Odds ratio; Injury prevention; Suicide prevention; Odds; Human factors and ergonomics; Environmental health; Occupational safety and health; Population; Gerontology; Demography; Medicine; Transport engineering; Geography; Engineering; Logistic regression; Sociology; Forestry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009917496,0.0004151719,0.0002785016,0.0003856869,0.00301433,0.0007878341,0.001248446,0.0006514374,0.002320163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002086703,0.00018699,0.0004142083,0.0007440733,0.0008030946,0.0003020292,0.0009452385,0.0006620624,0.00009318484],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02440376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02652474,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9767365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9901723,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986969,0.0003940557,0.00002568968,0.0001031474,0.000205747,0.000574565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984652,0.0001613513,0.0001723935,0.00006549705,0.0005632449,0.0005723658],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000542808,0.001681346,0.9305068,0.000264775,0.0002470583,0.003633641,0.005652839,0.002207413,0.003520091,0.001137181,0.005173641,0.0454324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001119652,0.001259306,0.9847842,0.00008286578,0.00008722873,0.0003067598,0.006976535,0.002169793,0.0005005202,0.0001028367,0.003584404,0.00003353909],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952819,0.000171544,0.0002383441,0.000725365,0.00001017639,0.000226566,0.0003504088,0.0000175581,0.002978163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977357,0.000144071,0.0003521109,0.0002145061,0.000006130481,0.00007319714,0.0001829521,0.000003840893,0.001287404],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02440376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1770625,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1630347398593779,"score_gpt":0.4411017988196754,"score_spread":0.2780670589602975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}