{"id":"W1969853139","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5965.2006.00623.x","title":"The Watchdogs of Subsidiarity: National Parliaments and the Logic of Arguing in the EU*","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":125,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidiarity; Political science; Scrutiny; Legislation; Democratic deficit; Proportionality (law); Law; Treaty; Argument (complex analysis); Legislature; Declaration; Law and economics; Public administration; Commission; Democracy; European union; Sociology; Politics; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006908484,0.00006083422,0.0002113748,0.00002928572,0.000382011,0.00002966911,0.0003611344,0.00001829107,0.000003810112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001217011,0.00002627088,0.00007240944,0.0001702173,0.001056988,0.00009105576,0.00006565803,0.0001668094,2.057518e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002755751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004285188,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000678283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002948966,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977357,0.001064653,0.000441264,0.00004378383,0.0005925827,0.0001219986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959947,0.003047266,0.0006433594,0.00007427821,0.0002289856,0.00001142198],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004826492,0.0001818337,0.09504814,0.00003395616,0.0001995956,0.000009899869,0.02709154,0.00004354027,0.00002003607,0.8234606,0.05114117,0.002287084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001498414,0.00007651895,0.6917259,0.0001774897,0.00004301008,0.000009397508,0.02104085,0.00001651809,0.00004417131,0.1774065,0.1078758,0.00008547267],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7430019,0.01714292,0.00000658817,0.04969323,0.0002570752,0.0002034225,0.000008092489,0.000002852311,0.1896839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990869,0.008082546,0.00002340382,0.0004362534,0.0001331973,0.000001404202,4.970302e-8,0.000002364714,0.0004517075],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6460541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3894517,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04419075936977557,"score_gpt":0.3551920560279475,"score_spread":0.3110012966581719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}