{"id":"W1969857256","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-7976.2000.tb00272.x","title":"Income Risk Analysis of Alternative Tillage Systems for Corn and Soybean Production on Clay Soils","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie","topic":"Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Nova Scotia Department of Agriculture","funders":"","keywords":"Tillage; Conventional tillage; Agronomy; Soil water; Mathematics; Environmental science; Cropping system; Strip-till; Crop yield; No-till farming; Crop; Biology; Soil science; Soil fertility","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001135162,0.0003780285,0.0002464365,0.0007666207,0.0001783039,0.0006608832,0.0003359559,0.0002268339,0.001318476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002026759,0.0001558392,0.000533209,0.0002876752,0.0002727817,0.0004714291,0.0003958051,0.0002329399,0.00006510076],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00223962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006888148,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02087555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01549294,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997293,0.00009405613,0.00001156542,0.00003081484,0.00005488329,0.0000793144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985563,0.000924403,0.0002491326,0.00005008287,0.0001088239,0.000111243],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008966918,0.0001266121,0.1062018,0.00004802608,0.0001239117,0.0002430775,0.0000825638,0.8689959,0.002794789,0.004634989,0.0003273483,0.0155243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001961499,0.0002071815,0.05644874,0.000004844544,0.00003497235,0.00003844571,0.00008359711,0.9409428,0.0006043933,0.001375973,0.0002277217,0.00001179915],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955219,0.00007074227,0.003410771,0.00003375428,0.000001117002,0.00001634185,0.0001426654,0.00001253607,0.0007902998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989649,0.00003175249,0.0005269132,0.000001998988,0.000001042401,0.000004060008,0.0001254294,0.000002093919,0.0003417442],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9791244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04150808,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01755863032494875,"score_gpt":0.1742133155517804,"score_spread":0.1566546852268317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}