{"id":"W1969921151","doi":"10.1139/l05-069","title":"Use of tree ring reconstructed streamflows to assess drought","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Tree-ring climate responses","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Manitoba Hydro","keywords":"Dendroclimatology; Streamflow; Quantile; Dendrochronology; Tree (set theory); Environmental science; Climate change; Resource (disambiguation); Hydrology (agriculture); Climatology; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics; Geology; Geography; Drainage basin; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002179914,0.0001261674,0.000241979,0.0005781346,0.00004268435,0.00007607837,0.0002249755,0.00005287262,0.0008566211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003821969,0.0001226011,0.00007564774,0.0003063937,0.00002250927,0.0004430007,0.000003710346,0.0001794098,0.000017166],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003799454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003719865,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004552202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.752601,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989753,0.00002518474,0.0003874039,0.00009677718,0.0001635151,0.0003518651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998711,0.0002364784,0.0001166656,0.0001354121,0.00008687482,0.0007135028],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000229887,0.000003202542,0.2179462,0.00003162395,0.00005507457,0.0001426925,0.000228726,0.7264526,0.0009665465,0.00003279923,0.0003474416,0.0537701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003191635,0.0001498738,0.922147,0.0004306331,0.00003750582,0.0005815909,0.00007910053,0.03226759,0.002108699,0.0000103264,0.04153964,0.0003288673],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.996906,0.0003922015,0.0006697097,0.0001561565,0.0004149915,0.00005131249,0.00007564344,0.00001339599,0.001320594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927906,0.00001750907,0.006929153,0.00002872029,0.0001715682,1.327672e-7,0.000002913969,0.000008406036,0.00005096019],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7480488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9379401,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02764844511788176,"score_gpt":0.2054385678895622,"score_spread":0.1777901227716804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}