{"id":"W1969945051","doi":"10.1071/ea07117","title":"An environmental weed risk assessment model for Australian forage improvement programs","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture","topic":"Biological Control of Invasive Species","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Weed; Forage; Weed control; Agroforestry; Risk assessment; Invasive species; Agronomy; Biology; Environmental science; Ecology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002676749,0.0004119581,0.0004898495,0.00001951279,0.0004834135,0.0001142327,0.0006410786,0.000260444,0.0003032225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001396882,0.0001449458,0.0005516091,0.0001299759,0.0002152236,0.0005934717,0.00005697731,0.0004267803,0.000006867263],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002108521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001783756,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004766395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002841214,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976779,0.00009852045,0.0007316205,0.0004066724,0.000504107,0.0005811768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985255,0.00004463251,0.0007558498,0.00009660166,0.0001192647,0.0004581256],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001547067,0.001159341,0.003931719,0.00000284965,0.000090131,0.00003143636,0.0001996136,0.0001086773,0.9836515,0.00006351656,0.004403419,0.006203047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003922285,0.02609527,0.3179925,0.00007540488,0.0001980688,0.0005792404,0.01182322,0.0004685698,0.6091806,0.0005971041,0.02754943,0.001518303],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970626,0.0001126197,0.00004158129,0.001288017,0.0001809421,0.0009444483,0.0002568121,0.0000372693,0.00007566339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930875,0.00004387181,0.004008552,0.0001874296,0.0006895047,0.0001021572,0.0002146882,0.00000369839,0.001662623],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3744709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5910718,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04087066497849449,"score_gpt":0.2648352587503699,"score_spread":0.2239645937718754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}