{"id":"W1969971118","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2014.11.040","title":"Investigating the effect of “defect co-fix” on quality assurance resource allocation: A search-based approach","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Systems and Software","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Artifact (error); Computer science; Quality assurance; Software; Software quality assurance; Resource allocation; Software bug; Quality (philosophy); Code (set theory); Software quality; Source code; Resource (disambiguation); Software inspection; Data mining; Software engineering; Software development; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Programming language; Operations management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007602049,0.0001368802,0.0003874611,0.0001339539,0.0001422356,0.0001588584,0.0006889374,0.00006891813,3.769322e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004753448,0.00008214044,0.0001224178,0.000320759,0.0001142876,0.0001434254,0.00005831539,0.0004138858,0.00000142237],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004778039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000953263,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004627703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.525151e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970299,0.001139307,0.0004911631,0.0001911214,0.0009377291,0.0002107629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991493,0.007307532,0.000350404,0.0004886684,0.000218933,0.0001414719],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001198196,0.0001131503,0.6490839,0.005575791,0.0002617813,0.0000149719,0.002939064,0.3061545,0.001448084,0.00505671,0.002982611,0.02624959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009009867,0.0110562,0.6134934,0.007924068,0.0001067392,0.0007421559,0.0005542409,0.3297753,0.01463172,0.0003030913,0.01099626,0.001406889],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4838263,0.000584875,0.5148945,0.0002216696,0.0001291883,0.0002228889,0.000002001468,0.000046377,0.00007217666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941184,0.000002441312,0.005647574,0.0000385742,0.0001493396,0.00000932372,7.151758e-7,0.00001164168,0.00002196932],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5102921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5690664,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02791326413177094,"score_gpt":0.2912585648168751,"score_spread":0.2633453006851042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}