{"id":"W1970036002","doi":"10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.01.020","title":"Adherend thickness influence on fatigue behavior and fatigue failure prediction of adhesively bonded joints","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Composites Part A Applied Science and Manufacturing","topic":"Mechanical Behavior of Composites","field":"Engineering","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of New Brunswick; University of Toronto","funders":"Division of Materials Research; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; General Motors of Canada","keywords":"Materials science; Composite material; Adhesive; Stiffness; Epoxy; Strain energy release rate; Paris' law; Residual stress; Residual strength; Structural engineering; Finite element method; Crack closure; Fracture mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002025884,0.0002687468,0.0002997268,0.0002082703,0.000248769,0.0001823899,0.0003119857,0.0001035078,0.00003756793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000163135,0.0002458093,0.00002903818,0.0001775608,0.0003642541,0.0004874471,0.0001564954,0.000257969,0.00001526163],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004489373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001981453,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001697734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003335058,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998309,0.00001298762,0.0003568162,0.0004412688,0.0004964361,0.0003835257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991739,0.00009997156,0.00008382624,0.0003141554,0.00008718003,0.0002409434],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006815544,0.00002926702,0.001259907,0.00007036635,0.000007071174,0.000001448621,0.0002049524,0.000469728,0.9947581,0.0004340758,0.00006965706,0.002688662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000292091,0.00008687447,0.1098413,0.0001050007,0.00003041987,0.00001186226,0.00007180315,0.001380534,0.8876512,0.0002266323,0.00008413183,0.00021807],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979692,0.00004667402,0.0003436488,0.00003386566,0.00009525866,0.0006877303,0.00001270117,0.0001796393,0.0006312694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979728,0.0000180076,0.001699865,0.00004357831,0.00002474925,0.000204501,0.00000593368,0.00002106618,0.000009437296],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1085814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999994,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02393472965571184,"score_gpt":0.2361178588057163,"score_spread":0.2121831291500044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}