{"id":"W1970057142","doi":"10.1007/s00267-004-0067-0","title":"Integrating Strategic Environmental Assessment with Industry Planning: A Case Study of the Pasquai-Porcupine Forest Management Plan, Saskatchewan, Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Management","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Plan (archaeology); Strategic environmental assessment; Environmental resource management; Business; Environmental planning; Strategic planning; Forest management; Order (exchange); Environmental impact assessment; Geography; Marketing; Ecology; Environmental science; Forestry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002175451,0.0004512597,0.0002280509,0.0009536535,0.009792371,0.003173107,0.001666647,0.001320889,0.002005095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003560115,0.0004384061,0.0002751015,0.003421705,0.002007582,0.000928971,0.002194718,0.001559917,0.0001683801],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04882514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0737002,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9746423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960601,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979538,0.0006507959,0.00005151478,0.0001026563,0.0005026659,0.0007385667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980149,0.0007346015,0.0001048357,0.00008952803,0.0006873428,0.0003687793],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009505085,0.002855761,0.357336,0.0006064972,0.0003787668,0.04249282,0.1239586,0.08043398,0.01081639,0.03162517,0.0214828,0.3270627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001988457,0.0008491846,0.2519403,0.00036745,0.0002455141,0.002801886,0.582606,0.04186695,0.005946458,0.005153555,0.1078203,0.0002034758],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9548457,0.0002700393,0.001966556,0.001726452,0.00001414266,0.0003539326,0.0001586614,0.00002992733,0.04063456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857988,0.0004418152,0.004552146,0.0002663998,0.000003052422,0.00007183262,0.0001140456,0.00001557189,0.008736245],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04882514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3542528,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01254988083263841,"score_gpt":0.2370975225164825,"score_spread":0.2245476416838441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}