{"id":"W1970079157","doi":"10.1139/l00-018","title":"A three-dimensional finite element model for locally reinforced timber joints made with hollow dowel fasteners","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Wood Treatment and Properties","field":"Engineering","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council","keywords":"Dowel; Fastener; Structural engineering; Finite element method; Stiffness; Failure mode and effects analysis; Joint (building); Brittleness; Orthotropic material; Materials science; Embedment; Composite material; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001023393,0.0002273748,0.0002470107,0.0002195587,0.00006255006,0.0000535418,0.0001331058,0.00006737401,0.0003267073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001106092,0.0001886537,0.0001083045,0.0001102,0.00001936071,0.0002081128,0.000003057961,0.0001748544,0.00001131022],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001788492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002698865,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001483084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02650397,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989827,0.000002634746,0.0003159193,0.00009579,0.0001678738,0.0004350533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992926,0.0000280344,0.00003718503,0.0001256648,0.0000789448,0.0004376229],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000356718,0.000002079406,0.00005973138,0.00003919772,0.0001778875,0.00005578139,0.0001924126,0.9968591,0.0002295453,0.00003472172,0.001576947,0.0007369001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001007435,0.000144741,0.0001133034,0.00023653,0.00005733947,0.00007245722,0.000008831384,0.9948509,0.0004600026,0.00002855092,0.002771587,0.0002483463],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4203548,0.002963976,0.5679438,0.0005373269,0.0007725201,0.0008482164,0.0001304505,0.0002088334,0.00624007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925119,0.00001434564,0.00620123,0.00005967405,0.0001092349,0.00001597943,0.000008764134,0.00006699353,0.001011861],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5721571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9912598,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0101949561923683,"score_gpt":0.1646647136815437,"score_spread":0.1544697574891754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}