{"id":"W1970168517","doi":"10.1016/j.compfluid.2014.10.013","title":"A coupled multimodal and boundary-element method for analysis of anti-slosh effectiveness of partial baffles in a partly-filled container","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computers & Fluids","topic":"Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions","field":"Engineering","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Slosh dynamics; Baffle; Mechanics; Inviscid flow; Boundary value problem; Acceleration; Structural engineering; Engineering; Physics; Classical mechanics; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Mechanical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005024507,0.0004936099,0.0008788979,0.0006107201,0.0006285153,0.0007452946,0.001447658,0.001982529,0.001824584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001102519,0.0004187741,0.0006086842,0.0004037172,0.001071202,0.0009075241,0.001082824,0.0007692772,0.0001990512],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004698327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008967227,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004299547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003444095,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998232,0.00005896548,0.000007859964,0.00002499484,0.00005955135,0.00002541272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995133,0.0002615144,0.00003426468,0.00003087619,0.0001087477,0.00005122638],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001358301,0.0001464586,0.001145776,0.0001419461,0.00003994358,0.0001952132,0.0001549406,0.9437717,0.01960128,0.01839676,0.0005587767,0.01571142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003421608,0.000008608059,0.00005702745,0.000003075545,0.000002139769,0.000007392618,0.000009116981,0.9990922,0.0003517451,0.0003296402,0.0001323285,0.00000339434],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.139785,0.0003894817,0.8519892,0.0002292963,0.0001159215,0.00008592939,0.00008024561,0.0002553783,0.007069542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8766744,0.0002619838,0.1160083,0.00009180565,0.00003908343,0.0001523615,0.0000973031,0.0001365996,0.006538234],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004299547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008549035,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009103306146735567,"score_gpt":0.278456760309054,"score_spread":0.2693534541623184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}