{"id":"W1970219229","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2010.08.001","title":"Bringing science into river systems cumulative effects assessment practice","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":122,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Cumulative effects; Watershed; Environmental resource management; Globe; Process (computing); Scale (ratio); Conceptual framework; Sustainability; Environmental planning; Drainage basin; Environmental science; Computer science; Geography; Ecology; Psychology; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002921062,0.0008962168,0.0009350449,0.0001386388,0.001191137,0.0003561927,0.001189869,0.0001888064,0.004887625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002146334,0.0007589572,0.0004104779,0.0007957208,0.002162633,0.003875297,0.001445029,0.001365522,0.001380494],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00419985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001753674,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001191056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001339266,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9930152,0.0004743232,0.0009573874,0.00130594,0.002865279,0.001381903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965281,0.0004104268,0.0007815059,0.001226611,0.00001415723,0.001039144],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003373568,0.003672862,0.5209854,0.0009546842,0.000458338,0.0002608094,0.001644678,0.000946173,0.4002418,0.001073192,0.004943567,0.06478476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001196727,0.0005991269,0.9597255,0.0008300804,0.0004733508,0.0001860197,0.000359782,0.002712605,0.001013821,0.0002442949,0.03118938,0.001469327],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.931886,0.003033874,0.001293376,0.0006693655,0.001744341,0.003825431,0.00003517609,0.0002017372,0.05731073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9786685,0.005530908,0.01301027,0.001555436,0.0001767081,0.0002618931,0.00007312431,0.0000994122,0.0006237591],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.43874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996228,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007586066633701836,"score_gpt":0.3662456978348396,"score_spread":0.3586596312011378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}