{"id":"W1970219229","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2010.08.001","title":"Bringing science into river systems cumulative effects assessment practice","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":122,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Cumulative effects; Watershed; Environmental resource management; Globe; Process (computing); Scale (ratio); Conceptual framework; Sustainability; Environmental planning; Drainage basin; Environmental science; Computer science; Geography; Ecology; Psychology; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04321446,0.0007064231,0.001098035,0.006760789,0.001479026,0.006948324,0.003337405,0.00323991,0.003788213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06341486,0.0005331389,0.0008374518,0.004893979,0.007237504,0.01111091,0.004047326,0.005890463,0.0007091293],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005849041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01338659,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01530768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03014521,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9836775,0.007259327,0.001521465,0.001389577,0.005849603,0.0003025221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8985847,0.05922799,0.003311847,0.00738322,0.03021399,0.001278296],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031076,0.0001251743,0.003583018,0.004183298,0.0002965125,0.0002109785,0.002543092,0.01071923,0.001081761,0.2837301,0.06602129,0.6274744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002213132,0.0001155752,0.001847381,0.003564689,0.0001578581,0.0001386736,0.001969205,0.002796029,0.0009492077,0.3836974,0.6046888,0.00005308462],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.01121054,0.3377533,0.2216155,0.3202854,0.008768684,0.0002975596,0.0003397923,0.0005662487,0.09916302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3351384,0.4430281,0.1669958,0.03230383,0.007049097,0.000483461,0.0002884235,0.0002362723,0.01447663],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04321446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2285426,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007586066633701836,"score_gpt":0.3662456978348396,"score_spread":0.3586596312011378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}