{"id":"W1970260435","doi":"10.1016/j.jfranklin.2012.03.001","title":"Probability of outlier analysis in weak GPS signal acquisition","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Franklin Institute","topic":"GNSS positioning and interference","field":"Engineering","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Outlier; Global Positioning System; GPS signals; SIGNAL (programming language); Computer science; Anomaly detection; Monte Carlo method; Range (aeronautics); Set (abstract data type); Detector; Assisted GPS; Algorithm; Statistics; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Engineering; Telecommunications","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004959297,0.00007681135,0.0002199774,0.0001669527,0.00002693124,0.00001144233,0.0002039569,0.00005624211,0.0000665077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003313606,0.00005312697,0.0002023223,0.0004014611,0.00005760748,0.0003627997,0.00002088319,0.00024408,0.000004970957],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008052852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002003898,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001828529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000178,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991603,0.00004585983,0.000433298,0.00004215703,0.0001857193,0.0001326642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995606,0.00002346154,0.0001398167,0.0001470639,0.00008304154,0.00004605023],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006685255,0.0003110285,0.2480907,0.0001035261,0.0007090722,0.000001713693,0.001469123,0.7325844,0.01251194,0.001584907,0.0008539495,0.001712781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009224353,0.0001152711,0.9324872,0.0004863437,0.0008026818,0.00005682582,0.0001091982,0.02543962,0.03412437,0.002401806,0.002774617,0.0002796169],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9828218,0.0003599311,0.01228133,0.00006405995,0.0008841723,0.00006451619,0.000004630884,0.00000954213,0.003510023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988186,0.00001505618,0.0009665311,0.00001616859,0.0001410804,0.000002080553,8.125702e-7,0.000004787853,0.00003483192],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7071448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2166455,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01862491245537684,"score_gpt":0.229051253764417,"score_spread":0.2104263413090401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}