{"id":"W1970309520","doi":"10.1007/s10763-011-9278-z","title":"THE DYNAMICS OF LEARNING SCIENCE IN EVERYDAY CONTEXTS: A CASE STUDY OF EVERYDAY SCIENCE CLASS IN KOREA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Science education; Science class; Learning sciences; Mathematics education; Curriculum; Scientific literacy; Thematic analysis; Context (archaeology); Class (philosophy); Pedagogy; General partnership; Perception; Dynamics (music); Psychology; Sociology; Qualitative research; Experiential learning; Computer science; Social science; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01622405,0.00007322207,0.0001505521,0.001401132,0.0006287557,0.0001721191,0.001496947,0.00002520192,0.00001653414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006290202,0.00005499697,0.00002305675,0.002604381,0.006308641,0.001629372,0.0001145739,0.0002008267,6.767801e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005796145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008722155,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002961847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004818634,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967714,0.00009976141,0.0006943359,0.0001906554,0.001990187,0.0002536839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952222,0.0003906039,0.000806232,0.0001449945,0.003304842,0.0001311595],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002271764,0.001832635,0.1432872,0.00001181611,0.00000594446,0.00001669464,0.6874187,0.00004774838,0.002159494,0.127778,0.00001603779,0.03740307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002924325,0.0001599022,0.05037947,0.0001371682,0.000006880145,0.0002103922,0.9383285,0.001856268,0.0006088843,0.007861556,0.0000730683,0.00008548795],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935113,0.00003894152,0.00008686248,0.000594757,0.001553419,0.0001955945,4.475222e-7,0.000002239897,0.004016402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989179,0.00009198367,0.0008020041,0.00002483276,0.00004188713,0.000005012368,5.82973e-8,0.000002569479,0.0001137574],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2509098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968975,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0624487501161402,"score_gpt":0.420165525678703,"score_spread":0.3577167755625628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}