{"id":"W1970318698","doi":"10.1080/00223890701293924","title":"The Utility of the NEO–PI–R Validity Scales to Detect Response Distortion: A Comparison With the MMPI–2","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Personality Assessment","topic":"Personality Disorders and Psychopathology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Windsor","keywords":"Psychology; Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory; Incremental validity; Convergent validity; Criterion validity; Discriminant validity; Personality; Personality test; Test validity; Psychometrics; Kappa; Predictive validity; Concurrent validity; Clinical psychology; Construct validity; Social psychology; Internal consistency; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01313152,0.0002398302,0.000477224,0.0000658025,0.0006402734,0.000060787,0.0009519721,0.0001275396,0.0002775159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002064373,0.0001092614,0.0004363686,0.0004566105,0.0007501281,0.00007382354,0.00009037022,0.0008595092,0.000006298526],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001843315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002365358,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002249125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002761122,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9946698,0.002560601,0.0009524751,0.000284086,0.001058038,0.0004750191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956663,0.001894603,0.001066827,0.0007832173,0.0004112007,0.0001778102],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.03359076,0.002150752,0.7776937,0.00007719886,0.0009531265,0.0001165367,0.02988278,0.00004642817,0.002599603,0.002633064,0.09553153,0.05472447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008163423,0.000818907,0.9243713,0.00003558102,0.000101819,0.000192477,0.01053502,0.0000178919,0.000100617,0.0003884339,0.06249025,0.0001313514],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9514581,0.0006334856,0.01439538,0.0294864,0.001066128,0.0003865809,0.00003633846,0.000009380386,0.002528213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977328,0.000009838865,0.0005121198,0.001049622,0.0002495164,0.00001286195,8.42148e-7,0.00001523602,0.0004171302],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1466776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.492453,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06227456763845576,"score_gpt":0.4047565155707331,"score_spread":0.3424819479322773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}