{"id":"W1970365581","doi":"10.1108/13522750610640530","title":"Methodology or “methodolatry”? An evaluation of focus groups and depth interviews","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Market Research An International Journal","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":330,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"AXYS Technologies (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Originality; Relevance (law); Qualitative research; Data collection; Psychology; Preference; Quality (philosophy); Value (mathematics); Qualitative property; Market research; Outcome (game theory); Marketing; Social psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Business; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4750437,0.001788478,0.001239534,0.008630773,0.003621771,0.005965905,0.003224666,0.002230164,0.008485981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4466711,0.001038911,0.001356073,0.005111903,0.006526171,0.009931814,0.008894705,0.001435735,0.001202242],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009614663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01083007,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001776069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001747882,"domain_scores_codex":[0.3448323,0.6080319,0.01248282,0.00309536,0.02852354,0.003034058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3304734,0.5714402,0.01900618,0.01907125,0.0564218,0.003587204],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002358263,0.0006088898,0.0107305,0.0212004,0.0001663911,0.0004228194,0.3856479,0.0005088535,0.00346319,0.02249399,0.005224542,0.5471743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00152814,0.01081992,0.03298396,0.0444058,0.0007221922,0.002478979,0.5536594,0.003304133,0.01185189,0.02188644,0.3160597,0.0002994748],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3696269,0.0230496,0.3667403,0.01926161,0.002937703,0.09162109,0.00139321,0.0008687371,0.1245008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.626147,0.01015092,0.2898023,0.00532691,0.0004220187,0.06042578,0.0004196179,0.0003774871,0.006927937],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5249563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6473647,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7358778416591036,"score_gpt":0.6828760694498885,"score_spread":0.05300177220921509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}