{"id":"W1970405099","doi":"10.1177/0306312710374130","title":"Evaluating the social capital accrued in large research networks: The case of the Sustainable Forest Management Network (1995-2009)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Studies of Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; Environment and Climate Change Canada; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Social capital; Excellence; Competition (biology); Social network analysis; Social network (sociolinguistics); Capital (architecture); Distribution (mathematics); Perspective (graphical); Sustainable development; Sociology; Regional science; Marketing; Knowledge management; Business; Public relations; Social science; Political science; Computer science; Geography; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.174477,0.0001412413,0.000340876,0.004542439,0.01092072,0.0009100246,0.006319164,0.00008563043,0.00003157637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03981408,0.00006249786,0.0001826172,0.1860472,0.01176614,0.0004499803,0.007543627,0.0009366231,0.000005565492],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002128028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004694554,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001070385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004297045,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9855076,0.0009909398,0.0008439754,0.0006560768,0.01024455,0.001756843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844635,0.007414761,0.0004715597,0.0007620208,0.006799381,0.00008884954],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001664983,0.0006461163,0.1748787,0.00008367921,0.0001620657,0.0001863291,0.08879804,0.005605008,0.0004931844,0.5271335,0.05361799,0.1482289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006151706,0.0001718024,0.4560454,0.00001621004,0.00001643022,0.000008381176,0.4359418,0.0126666,0.00003656055,0.09274139,0.001571398,0.0001688021],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9896781,0.001100842,0.00004265474,0.00427897,0.0008990624,0.0009238918,0.000007813421,0.00000512835,0.003063541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984702,0.0001094978,0.00009552771,0.00006957797,0.0003644903,0.00005791381,1.330006e-7,0.00000654818,0.000826083],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4343921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990571,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6211380137896874,"score_gpt":0.6552401674890737,"score_spread":0.0341021536993863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}