{"id":"W1970405099","doi":"10.1177/0306312710374130","title":"Evaluating the social capital accrued in large research networks: The case of the Sustainable Forest Management Network (1995-2009)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Studies of Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; Environment and Climate Change Canada; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Social capital; Excellence; Competition (biology); Social network analysis; Social network (sociolinguistics); Capital (architecture); Distribution (mathematics); Perspective (graphical); Sustainable development; Sociology; Regional science; Marketing; Knowledge management; Business; Public relations; Social science; Political science; Computer science; Geography; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007677222,0.0001634684,0.000203035,0.005528552,0.002698802,0.002875157,0.0006827908,0.0007018493,0.001379405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03405644,0.0001122084,0.0002213904,0.007568396,0.002121515,0.004272184,0.00267464,0.0004930703,0.0001263955],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009910511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003291837,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09157072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1303314,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970493,0.001314106,0.000137205,0.0002697424,0.0007423242,0.0004874892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9710481,0.01503668,0.007629595,0.001198923,0.003137297,0.001949423],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003812616,0.0002017786,0.8342465,0.0001725762,0.0002296988,0.001862983,0.01756038,0.0103462,0.0009447995,0.04246705,0.002709936,0.08887683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004294394,0.0001821394,0.9054263,0.0001746125,0.0001727287,0.0006798254,0.03309898,0.02095062,0.001455472,0.01733981,0.02040408,0.00007247327],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9856879,0.0004111662,0.0009962781,0.001252265,0.000008464221,0.00003348782,0.0002086333,0.000006445088,0.01139546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985576,0.000198707,0.0006312188,0.00001878909,0.000008438737,0.00001416015,0.0001104158,0.000001627456,0.0004590332],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9973012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1820754,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6211380137896874,"score_gpt":0.6552401674890737,"score_spread":0.0341021536993863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}