{"id":"W1970415148","doi":"10.1016/j.jfe.2010.07.001","title":"Carbon sequestration and the optimal forest harvest decision: A dynamic programming approach considering biomass and dead organic matter","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis","keywords":"Carbon sequestration; Environmental science; Taiga; Biomass (ecology); Carbon fibers; Carbon cycle; Carbon sink; Organic matter; Boreal; Agroforestry; Forestry; Carbon dioxide; Ecology; Ecosystem; Mathematics; Geography; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001126846,0.001091201,0.001029245,0.0007584683,0.000737123,0.002050992,0.0008195501,0.001545693,0.002375931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002430885,0.0009070233,0.0008679475,0.0006822467,0.001476879,0.001055209,0.0007248938,0.001397338,0.0001160359],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004203004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004562344,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0987564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07616352,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996843,0.0001191886,0.000006760251,0.00003761715,0.00003158882,0.0001205068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998834,0.0009239451,0.00007990022,0.0000105336,0.00006462217,0.00008706799],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002892202,0.00002188794,0.0005001206,0.000007178146,0.00001230997,0.00002222688,0.000008957592,0.9970838,0.0001129144,0.001321151,0.000063817,0.0008166119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001294606,0.00002292279,0.0002132654,0.000002908176,0.000008610463,0.000003142533,0.00001726127,0.9980064,0.00006308883,0.001581275,0.00006340036,0.000004766559],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7685948,0.0007803119,0.2150255,0.00178237,0.00006098958,0.0001513935,0.0004334983,0.0001129497,0.01305807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833278,0.0002925632,0.01305753,0.00006949098,0.00002352865,0.00008421714,0.0001139538,0.00002076267,0.003010172],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0987564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1963632,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006886777862216755,"score_gpt":0.2083810392118771,"score_spread":0.2014942613496604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}