{"id":"W1970415148","doi":"10.1016/j.jfe.2010.07.001","title":"Carbon sequestration and the optimal forest harvest decision: A dynamic programming approach considering biomass and dead organic matter","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis","keywords":"Carbon sequestration; Environmental science; Taiga; Biomass (ecology); Carbon fibers; Carbon cycle; Carbon sink; Organic matter; Boreal; Agroforestry; Forestry; Carbon dioxide; Ecology; Ecosystem; Mathematics; Geography; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005291249,0.0001293031,0.0001788814,0.00006204345,0.0001126089,0.0002483088,0.0001696048,0.00006563136,0.00007039265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002795697,0.00009144053,0.00004566734,0.00005784166,0.0004158574,0.0004133808,0.0001472897,0.0002151068,0.00001689534],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004866331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001674859,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002347222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002618568,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992219,0.00001976401,0.0003504414,0.0001492811,0.00007438864,0.0001841864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993778,0.00008316471,0.0002852808,0.0001506827,0.000008182866,0.00009481861],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001786968,0.00005153423,0.9810023,0.00003478335,0.00005609226,0.00001318924,0.0007000057,0.005044713,0.0004294007,0.003746548,0.0001999997,0.008542693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003045819,0.0002314755,0.8095487,0.00003002494,0.0001336466,0.001170794,0.0001741111,0.1716114,0.00004789343,0.007021544,0.006591171,0.000393396],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971454,0.00003080835,0.0005264296,0.0004359287,0.0001305819,0.0001936586,7.25482e-7,0.000005769727,0.001530766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895231,0.00004721931,0.01011589,0.00009678098,0.00008549901,0.000004392371,0.00000140824,0.00001592387,0.0001097489],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1714536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3728837,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006886777862216755,"score_gpt":0.2083810392118771,"score_spread":0.2014942613496604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}