{"id":"W1970475751","doi":"10.3138/jsp.44.3.001","title":"A Three-Decade History of the Duration of Peer Review","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Duration (music); Variety (cybernetics); History; Library science; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics; Art; Literature; World Wide Web","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03419195,0.0005328148,0.0008014961,0.006289825,0.002862945,0.008044534,0.002307165,0.00279948,0.007806384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09023181,0.0006485914,0.0006232428,0.009268364,0.007944941,0.005182756,0.005783366,0.00486597,0.003674361],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01309436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01578144,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01173096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007958042,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9754799,0.005683442,0.003657725,0.004812541,0.0092168,0.001149566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8116735,0.05141852,0.02746453,0.0132748,0.07792667,0.01824189],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005356775,0.0001617551,0.01324716,0.004857546,0.000133803,0.000355101,0.007889746,0.0007847389,0.002520067,0.1157504,0.09663855,0.7571254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002003168,0.0001507336,0.02198195,0.001632632,0.00002726549,0.0004996463,0.000908582,0.0002164022,0.0007531859,0.005475222,0.9682614,0.00007296018],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0537615,0.6017062,0.02855675,0.134089,0.02009032,0.0005544686,0.002055478,0.001098601,0.1580877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5325236,0.3163368,0.02093501,0.02386662,0.02800487,0.00116963,0.00167738,0.0007570468,0.07472911],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9937102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1808265,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5442823854424196,"score_gpt":0.4936988252964719,"score_spread":0.05058356014594773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}