{"id":"W1970483014","doi":"10.1068/c0052","title":"Fiscal Arrangements for Maintaining an Effective State in Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environment and Planning C Government and Policy","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; State (computer science); Fiscal federalism; Order (exchange); Federalism; Inequality; Perspective (graphical); Population; Economics; Political science; Political economy; Development economics; Economic system; Market economy; Decentralization; Sociology; Finance; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002431304,0.0001028066,0.000113947,0.00002301009,0.0002260734,0.00003610648,0.00006166324,0.00003040203,0.00002687584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004529095,0.0001103314,0.00001294448,0.00004719466,0.0000658447,0.0001250827,0.0000230719,0.00006755507,7.509394e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009123738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001061186,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9484634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.929917,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990271,0.00005684403,0.0001070236,0.0001868895,0.000255897,0.0003662388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995571,0.0001334282,0.00005589393,0.00006112302,0.000001302499,0.0001911331],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001722493,0.00002717964,0.9155111,0.0000107606,0.00002658834,0.00003923148,0.02333998,0.0003047809,0.00004441306,0.004155338,0.004545869,0.05182248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006916914,0.00007254598,0.649446,0.00002710271,0.000006771476,0.00000123208,0.002326999,0.0002176455,0.00001791783,0.001273589,0.3457376,0.0001809654],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942789,0.0001550041,0.00007957324,0.002078748,0.00004131861,0.0003143075,0.0002106406,0.000004068484,0.002837434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956334,0.0003654706,0.00004114792,0.001315059,0.0002488454,0.00003615967,0.000005615555,0.000007732852,0.00234659],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3411917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4499185,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0112190639128475,"score_gpt":0.2589972012077341,"score_spread":0.2477781372948866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}