{"id":"W1970491522","doi":"10.1021/es011490d","title":"New Technique for Estimating Thresholds of Toxicity in Ecological Risk Assessment","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Science & Technology","topic":"Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Toxicant; Risk assessment; Probabilistic logic; Toxicity; Probabilistic risk assessment; Hazard analysis; Myriophyllum; Environmental science; Statistics; Toxicology; Biology; Ecology; Mathematics; Aquatic plant; Chemistry; Computer science; Macrophyte; Reliability engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004645617,0.001449821,0.001412023,0.004541634,0.0007868733,0.001637509,0.001796087,0.001606503,0.003156753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01330271,0.0008852856,0.001453888,0.002980691,0.001132771,0.003645336,0.00255663,0.003522583,0.001052206],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001508285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001158333,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002087174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002532524,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9938647,0.001260704,0.0004171369,0.0009829722,0.003332583,0.0001419068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992884,0.003359262,0.0009090449,0.0009125415,0.001825241,0.0001098664],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003576948,0.00035763,0.01228735,0.001722487,0.0005131894,0.0004523291,0.001006593,0.05491335,0.2142434,0.07149249,0.008504456,0.6341491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002204433,0.00122862,0.02643594,0.0005083483,0.0005860004,0.003872506,0.000465031,0.4913551,0.1968991,0.1458772,0.1318415,0.0007102283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.003830239,0.0006835485,0.9919151,0.00008800023,0.00008551958,0.0001717445,0.0002045393,0.0007668704,0.00225443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06813757,0.001127126,0.9255409,0.0002466915,0.00007143524,0.0009278889,0.0005680162,0.0001847046,0.003195644],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004645617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02456868,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0119759229185247,"score_gpt":0.2576598153382975,"score_spread":0.2456838924197728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}