{"id":"W1970521487","doi":"10.1017/s0008423902778189","title":"Context and Francophone Support for the Sovereignty of Quebec: An Ecological Analysis","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"French; Sovereignty; Voting; Population; Context (archaeology); Political science; Politics; Government (linguistics); Geography; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Demography; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001023246,0.0001691052,0.0002977878,0.001758809,0.002692947,0.001419567,0.0006877056,0.0002987216,0.004370969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003976783,0.0001077465,0.0003398503,0.002557355,0.00125062,0.0004548535,0.0009802147,0.0005058559,0.0001359264],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01243653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005683597,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9776933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9878469,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999345,0.0002017764,0.00002047368,0.0001166802,0.0001081105,0.0002079539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973497,0.0007862816,0.0005025442,0.0001384501,0.0007629109,0.0004599939],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009433871,0.00003138854,0.9835877,0.00002098701,0.0001168928,0.0001386528,0.002443598,0.0008658224,0.0002917146,0.001963098,0.0009801645,0.009465828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004212282,0.00001388036,0.9947975,0.00001581298,0.00002177702,0.00002355035,0.001801983,0.001927208,0.00003325763,0.0001332453,0.001218966,0.000008549146],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953917,0.000209774,0.0003130719,0.0002042972,0.000003051858,0.00001436563,0.0006302658,0.000005393736,0.003228004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999171,0.00005235503,0.0001387156,0.00001556381,0.000001374691,0.000005685526,0.0002081226,0.000001568901,0.0004056104],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02230674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0902338,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02337222448566319,"score_gpt":0.2625475086562474,"score_spread":0.2391752841705842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}