{"id":"W1970585990","doi":"10.1016/j.aquabot.2010.09.005","title":"Shifts in aquatic macrophyte abundance and community composition in cottage developed lakes of the Canadian Shield","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aquatic Botany","topic":"Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Macrophyte; Species richness; Littoral zone; Biomass (ecology); Abundance (ecology); Aquatic plant; Ecology; Ordination; Environmental science; Range (aeronautics); Species diversity; Geography; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008338559,0.0001220592,0.0002039347,0.00004072633,0.000210841,0.00002601434,0.0003088494,0.00009874436,0.0001159099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001085891,0.00009992949,0.00002224408,0.0003239228,0.0002378853,0.0001022367,0.00008653904,0.0005927318,0.00003508304],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001453759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006599409,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3235576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9936451,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988125,0.0002609084,0.0003543491,0.0001401082,0.0001911923,0.000240922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991325,0.0002830808,0.0001236669,0.0003688615,0.000002991113,0.00008889889],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006557697,0.00006574235,0.9878728,0.00002748344,0.000003911829,0.000005337479,0.003080101,0.00008126257,0.006608339,0.00111061,0.00002219028,0.001115634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003518237,0.00002719075,0.9631911,0.0001062395,0.000005672699,0.000005403576,0.0002358124,0.03181055,0.0001992346,0.003745275,0.0001723211,0.0001494089],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937587,0.00001717351,0.00004998302,0.0003343104,0.0001204268,0.0003337961,0.00001053783,0.000005104753,0.005369988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991205,0.000003732375,0.0005906575,0.0001900762,0.000006107064,0.0000140269,0.000002625856,0.000009687682,0.00006259005],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6700875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6809469,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00962122861195121,"score_gpt":0.2159294222144645,"score_spread":0.2063081936025133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}