{"id":"W1970665462","doi":"10.1139/b03-150","title":"Cryptic dioecy in <i>Actinidia polygama</i>: a test of the pollinator attraction hypothesis","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Botany","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dioecy; Biology; Pollinator; Pollen; Pollination; Actinidia; Stamen; Attraction; Botany; Actinidia chinensis","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001359995,0.00006804374,0.0001468241,0.00001724,0.0001163477,0.00001948396,0.0001769113,0.0000427628,0.00006027453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002611653,0.00002351287,0.00009726151,0.0002525184,0.00006011669,0.00008044909,0.000006736862,0.0001341934,0.000004484718],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008102577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001025607,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006730343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2572692,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994103,0.00002071168,0.0002212771,0.00005963947,0.0001075678,0.0001805318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994617,0.0001615403,0.0001711489,0.00001504974,0.00004976328,0.0001408255],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002564698,0.00007043231,0.4991104,0.000005099397,0.00002393862,0.00009278429,0.0002161604,0.00001348207,0.487082,0.0001417003,0.0004161317,0.01280224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001209038,0.0001605424,0.9918817,0.00007863789,0.0000100442,0.00006175291,0.0002824234,5.356134e-7,0.003909893,0.0005609312,0.002873998,0.00005867813],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956492,0.0007738153,9.641704e-8,0.002975171,0.00009088753,0.00004122291,0.00002899225,0.000001562718,0.0004390104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995888,0.00007085769,0.00002025732,0.0001336073,0.0001343065,4.700848e-7,8.392932e-8,5.786981e-7,0.00005105678],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4927713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998839,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03110698755081913,"score_gpt":0.180034864946214,"score_spread":0.1489278773953949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}