{"id":"W197079831","doi":"10.1080/14486563.2004.10648598","title":"The Canadian ‘Model Forest’ Approach: A Way Forward for Tasmania?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian Journal of Environmental Management","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Corporate governance; Stakeholder; Forest management; Environmental resource management; Adaptive management; Business; Geography; Political science; Forestry; Economics; Ecology; Public relations; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004191013,0.0004705076,0.0004949959,0.0009883624,0.009500164,0.007066076,0.002802992,0.003424622,0.009712549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005333354,0.0002843973,0.0007692823,0.002134138,0.005714213,0.005374739,0.00272659,0.005831952,0.0006354492],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06857666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2672487,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9757203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9910018,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967604,0.0005800974,0.00007031112,0.0002561207,0.001031501,0.001301492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952757,0.0002690716,0.000146836,0.0001894806,0.002372724,0.001746174],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009789508,0.0001175795,0.007974062,0.0004642744,0.00007774069,0.0007187237,0.006052818,0.001844384,0.001118586,0.4329291,0.4201061,0.1284987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004780493,0.00006998987,0.01547314,0.0008223689,0.00006578396,0.0002502381,0.01329764,0.002732561,0.0003121363,0.05535293,0.9114318,0.0001436295],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01573451,0.0132645,0.006714772,0.8783448,0.004416483,0.0001179129,0.0003618712,0.000252232,0.08079303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5202453,0.03530343,0.06147054,0.2688013,0.001245068,0.0002835745,0.00065117,0.0002685021,0.1117312],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06857666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4975609,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01101617177693281,"score_gpt":0.2104465084585678,"score_spread":0.199430336681635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}