{"id":"W1970804854","doi":"10.1016/j.ejor.2007.03.049","title":"Augmenting the lot sizing order quantity when demand is probabilistic","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Operational Research","topic":"Supply Chain and Inventory Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sizing; Probabilistic logic; Order (exchange); Computer science; Operations research; Economic order quantity; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Business; Artificial intelligence; Marketing; Supply chain","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001313342,0.0006866617,0.0008881565,0.00041934,0.0002285596,0.0008807271,0.001067563,0.0006642033,0.004793181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006055237,0.0004066991,0.000415498,0.0007005495,0.0003751933,0.001916959,0.0006068193,0.0006833245,0.0005592206],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005161136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012005,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00201981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003524514,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994843,0.0001675114,0.00003508245,0.00008525835,0.0001748149,0.00005305932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972422,0.001747193,0.0002205495,0.0004038026,0.0003085906,0.00007770855],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003590646,0.00008478537,0.0008663639,0.0000801754,0.00002642316,0.00006490436,0.00003072424,0.9247233,0.006277129,0.00690311,0.0007121239,0.05987188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001448261,0.00007762966,0.0002530788,0.000003890314,0.00001286114,0.00002091726,0.000005134998,0.99443,0.001041033,0.003578616,0.0005565392,0.000005775042],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1353754,0.0003153493,0.8527611,0.000435329,0.0002405696,0.0001008592,0.0002213083,0.001565376,0.008984684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8881637,0.0001311087,0.1081486,0.00007333366,0.0001048549,0.00003659456,0.0001488217,0.0001156077,0.003077426],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004793181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01603472,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1248780494431058,"score_gpt":0.3388179702224552,"score_spread":0.2139399207793495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}