{"id":"W1971053178","doi":"10.1361/10599490418442","title":"Proposed Modification to the Zheng and Hirt Fatigue Model","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance","topic":"Fatigue and fracture mechanics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Materials science; Predictability; Ultimate tensile strength; Fracture (geology); Fracture mechanics; Structural engineering; Tension (geology); Fatigue limit; Fatigue testing; Goodman relation; Composite material; Stress concentration; Engineering; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003259392,0.0004245311,0.000800696,0.0004734272,0.0004109028,0.0005530635,0.002160329,0.001641883,0.008685111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006980135,0.0002061194,0.000797197,0.0003543421,0.0003601252,0.000932947,0.0007976293,0.0005804551,0.002086653],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004644954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008132976,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003710652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003861164,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999756,0.00004002062,0.00001167415,0.00007053641,0.00009140443,0.00003036228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997663,0.00003132993,0.00001473047,0.00005368588,0.0001202014,0.00001366557],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002011304,0.0002006502,0.001991331,0.0002709977,0.0001276613,0.0007695386,0.0002514016,0.5925716,0.03131888,0.1831961,0.0128263,0.1762746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001626313,0.000036925,0.0003525504,0.000006918808,0.00001646837,0.0001163837,0.00001199747,0.9842557,0.0009808794,0.01017774,0.004010412,0.00001772039],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02384618,0.0004875322,0.9419662,0.001032965,0.0005493148,0.0001933734,0.0003891538,0.0005625795,0.03097263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.784489,0.0007852766,0.1546276,0.000654784,0.0003094855,0.0004992745,0.0005755862,0.00029364,0.05776542],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008685111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02905458,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01671433500124319,"score_gpt":0.2067093144469049,"score_spread":0.1899949794456617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}