{"id":"W1971054041","doi":"10.1068/a34129","title":"Social and Geographic Inequities in the Residential Property Tax: A Review and Case Study—A Commentary","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Environment and Planning A Economy and Space","topic":"Housing Market and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property tax; Property (philosophy); Residential property; Point (geometry); Public economics; Quality (philosophy); Actuarial science; Location; Tax planning; Social impact assessment; Business; Regional science; Economics; Sociology; Environmental planning; Tax reform; Geography; Tax avoidance; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01252406,0.000579535,0.002769797,0.005725975,0.001025138,0.003248255,0.002283894,0.005844503,0.001678319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05651737,0.0005349939,0.001249109,0.01180535,0.002163286,0.003040747,0.0009588334,0.002524917,0.000822921],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007309477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01485857,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03538649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06531018,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9902811,0.004349211,0.001733221,0.0006027845,0.0027941,0.0002395199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9426317,0.03876105,0.00376119,0.000526985,0.01392804,0.0003910027],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001602576,0.00003513064,0.0007495069,0.06428283,0.0004521267,0.001905367,0.002654631,0.0003210117,0.0003987602,0.01093177,0.7244923,0.1936164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004690456,0.00007753474,0.003163458,0.07527937,0.0004976557,0.001773166,0.002843097,0.0001226611,0.0002194867,0.002536492,0.9133911,0.00004919139],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003846351,0.9446976,0.000157504,0.04575009,0.007547639,0.00003251953,0.00007647183,0.000006652829,0.001346982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01213421,0.9395128,0.0004923576,0.03779183,0.008202143,0.0001495364,0.00008510249,0.00001109395,0.001620944],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03538649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07036108,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07700506066157606,"score_gpt":0.2589130129314919,"score_spread":0.1819079522699158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}