{"id":"W1971069557","doi":"10.1108/00400911111115681","title":"University‐community engagement: a case study using popular theatre","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Education + Training","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Brantford Energy (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Agency (philosophy); Service-learning; Perspective (graphical); Psychology; General partnership; Experiential learning; Pedagogy; Service (business); Higher education; Mathematics education; Public relations; Sociology; Social psychology; Computer science; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002908052,0.00009286754,0.00009966347,0.0001498642,0.004385031,0.00005694142,0.0003777474,0.00004399878,0.0004003128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000692099,0.0001117575,0.00004054671,0.0004122028,0.00006989409,0.0002346866,0.00009640404,0.0006043821,0.00001558771],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001741344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004439304,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1441781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009256494,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950037,0.004361683,0.0001204072,0.0001168793,0.0001762279,0.000221122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992331,0.0001278535,0.00008407545,0.000360624,0.000084527,0.0001097641],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004351543,0.0006608097,0.00860157,0.000004968586,0.00003074786,0.00003818206,0.9538274,0.000009374909,0.000004548633,0.001816434,0.00003532384,0.03496634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001702422,0.00005742477,0.001853195,0.0000231151,0.00005376281,0.00001580219,0.9755337,0.00001964957,0.000002148463,0.000155754,0.02199646,0.0001187271],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8725152,0.00002315539,0.00008639832,0.0001110979,0.0003428784,0.0002381913,5.853839e-7,0.0001155755,0.1265669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970214,0.000005044002,0.001998768,0.0001395019,0.0001062206,0.000004078064,0.000003797652,0.00001142325,0.0007097773],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1349216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969111,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4044778988278148,"score_gpt":0.3812492713078606,"score_spread":0.02322862751995425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}