{"id":"W1971096171","doi":"10.1109/pes.2004.1373143","title":"On composite load modeling for voltage stability and under voltage load shedding","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2004.","topic":"Power System Optimization and Stability","field":"Engineering","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Jacobs (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Load Shedding; Voltage; Computer science; Dynamic load testing; Control theory (sociology); Voltage regulation; Aggregate (composite); Stability (learning theory); Reliability engineering; Electric power system; Engineering; Control (management); Power (physics); Structural engineering; Electrical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001092439,0.001041383,0.0007912872,0.0006717866,0.000490569,0.00117752,0.001200516,0.001154953,0.003350097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002058889,0.0004228766,0.001214792,0.001122828,0.0006507396,0.001858369,0.0008704105,0.001581765,0.001026864],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008586085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007494072,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005137686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004417135,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994909,0.0002093669,0.00002304656,0.00007537,0.0001670408,0.00003430704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993308,0.0003481034,0.00007858834,0.00008742098,0.0001357229,0.00001944684],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002460444,0.00003102093,0.000271623,0.00005416346,0.00001719214,0.0000678739,0.00009080886,0.8424873,0.001199816,0.1334827,0.001857918,0.02041499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001408515,0.000008759621,0.0000407756,0.000006082739,0.000002969045,0.00001037973,0.000004325675,0.9776292,0.0001197869,0.02038848,0.001783952,0.00000383353],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004037496,0.0004909668,0.9850222,0.0002851406,0.00007985118,0.00002358185,0.00009013564,0.0001936015,0.009776908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6867465,0.004646905,0.2744715,0.0003993657,0.0006745872,0.0003454123,0.0007451935,0.000595398,0.03137523],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005137686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01120722,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01161401058515399,"score_gpt":0.2207516398291873,"score_spread":0.2091376292440333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}