{"id":"W1971252299","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2005.02.008","title":"The quality of randomized trial reporting in leading medical journals since the revised CONSORT statement","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Clinical Trials","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":215,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Blinding; Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials; Medicine; Randomized controlled trial; Observational study; Randomization; Family medicine; Confidence interval; Sample size determination; MEDLINE; Clinical trial; Health care; Alternative medicine; Research design; Surgery; Internal medicine; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.7961516,0.002024842,0.009243138,0.01615916,0.002805444,0.02521153,0.007121921,0.01254586,0.002047196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9417599,0.004651689,0.008559455,0.02020789,0.01833758,0.01471984,0.008476041,0.02610393,0.0007764229],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01818297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03305779,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005363011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034271,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1317926,0.5733712,0.2057889,0.01978477,0.06738812,0.001874417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.01500639,0.7750399,0.09440148,0.03108594,0.08262561,0.001840735],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"reporting","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005490449,0.0003064052,0.04517829,0.08839209,0.02924203,0.0001799651,0.006124142,0.003531772,0.001284698,0.1106123,0.1093367,0.6003212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007019348,0.002750793,0.09450559,0.1686872,0.03899113,0.00210745,0.002028996,0.01944743,0.008262283,0.3785981,0.2748144,0.002787303],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009323785,0.4976372,0.1297322,0.3120966,0.0395892,0.002694787,0.00321458,0.000633596,0.005078051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2841211,0.1982813,0.3102586,0.1130714,0.07426545,0.01227916,0.004316077,0.001391886,0.002014923],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2038484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2513815,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9720605239675982,"score_gpt":0.7458253644107702,"score_spread":0.226235159556828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}