{"id":"W1971257081","doi":"10.2174/1874297101306010001","title":"Workshop Report: Evaluation of Epidemiological Data Consistency forApplication in Regulatory Risk Assessment","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Open Epidemiology Journal","topic":"Environmental Justice and Health Disparities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Health Canada; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Operationalization; Risk assessment; Constructive; Government (linguistics); Variety (cybernetics); Exposure assessment; Epidemiology; Public health; Management science; Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental health; Computer science; Medicine; Engineering; Process (computing); Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1054919,0.00009967067,0.0004794843,0.00004619493,0.0007640505,0.000033792,0.001419909,0.0001885402,0.001076702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01883127,0.0000643075,0.00005277181,0.0001259765,0.0009391553,0.0006559278,0.000426611,0.0006397797,0.00002267158],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002754131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005609709,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005093823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002805369,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9865804,0.01103063,0.00133855,0.000303234,0.0003416317,0.0004055299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909428,0.006276543,0.001656591,0.0008172173,0.0001634157,0.0001434268],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002072918,0.0001202235,0.895735,0.00001352739,0.00003979876,0.000002570775,0.001010932,0.0008613238,0.00001129971,0.04072832,0.02172103,0.03973522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002603218,0.00002228941,0.8264676,0.00006089076,0.00008287914,0.00002972152,0.008757371,0.002702525,4.231295e-7,0.1594474,0.00210196,0.00006664962],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8540491,0.006774824,0.003057995,0.09363723,0.0005518186,0.003103561,0.00001618321,0.0000145023,0.03879474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9813345,0.01004281,0.00626223,0.001769252,0.000232911,0.0001491015,0.00003254274,0.000006360211,0.000170276],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1272854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998364,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3738533974409831,"score_gpt":0.526535181452561,"score_spread":0.1526817840115779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}