{"id":"W1971409363","doi":"10.1093/ejil/chs015","title":"Boundary Agreements in the International Court of Justice's Case Law, 2000-2010","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Sovereignty; Boundary (topology); Political science; International court; Realm; International law; Constitutional court; Sociology; Maritime boundary; Economic Justice; Public international law; Constitution; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003668201,0.0001154554,0.0001447723,0.0001574587,0.0002874476,0.000166365,0.001197937,0.00002972128,0.001263154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001406045,0.00008446389,0.0001509802,0.00005706666,0.0004131624,0.0008410683,0.00007727385,0.00032103,0.00009018771],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002154563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001151244,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005347466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001202779,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972314,0.0004891021,0.0006970442,0.0000982117,0.001254637,0.000229605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983625,0.0002188453,0.0005664057,0.0001155517,0.0006333573,0.0001033706],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006596414,0.0002747449,0.0005426751,0.000003892895,0.0001028397,0.001009643,0.008650722,0.00001787771,0.00009167974,0.9857805,0.00324777,0.0002116602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001233484,0.0001164566,0.00776045,0.0001402442,0.00007548562,0.001836432,0.002538985,0.00002435616,0.0001304135,0.01508422,0.9708593,0.0002001241],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2854371,0.0001258744,0.0001400754,0.003340524,0.005795858,0.00008648819,0.00003475752,0.000006613224,0.7050326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894916,0.00002851633,0.0005215394,0.001585867,0.0029321,9.556957e-7,0.000009275309,0.00001345956,0.005416685],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9706963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996498,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03247500940106284,"score_gpt":0.3090061692052893,"score_spread":0.2765311598042265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}