{"id":"W1971447498","doi":"10.1006/anbe.2003.2278","title":"The twin threshold model: risk-intermediate foraging by rufous hummingbirds, Selasphorus rufus","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Directorate for Biological Sciences","keywords":"Foraging; Preference; Biology; Reproduction; Statistics; Variance (accounting); Optimal foraging theory; Demography; Ecology; Zoology; Mathematics; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007695775,0.0002025094,0.0002465652,0.00005240301,0.000410642,0.0001256776,0.0002497561,0.000106557,0.0002151844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004503091,0.0002024258,0.0001373378,0.00006670925,0.00008525715,0.0002480329,0.00005829431,0.0002522079,0.0008882676],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001957294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001276584,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002212047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003096946,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985141,0.00002012604,0.0005508206,0.0004320087,0.00004838977,0.0004346178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991751,0.00003997464,0.0003484515,0.0003294917,0.000007696712,0.00009925358],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001460917,0.00007635096,0.9666182,0.000002279829,0.00002768762,0.000002196174,0.0003031321,0.000483312,0.0001184058,0.02736039,0.004458835,0.0005346101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002585671,0.0005076455,0.844389,0.00002101774,0.0001167801,0.00002811096,0.001320988,0.07302825,0.00212533,0.04701477,0.02729318,0.001569231],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9863883,0.002027937,0.001119395,0.0001045241,0.0002710378,0.0002050179,0.0001562157,0.00004758669,0.009680046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966165,0.0007757696,0.0003168796,0.0001636168,0.00003819199,0.00005060651,0.00002338954,0.00004911968,0.001965912],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1222292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998897,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04783656272666771,"score_gpt":0.2178169890961413,"score_spread":0.1699804263694736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}