{"id":"W1971528452","doi":"10.2307/3315984","title":"Reconstructing the history of forest fire frequency: Identifying hazard rate change points using the bayes information criterion","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Bayes' theorem; Hazard; Statistics; Fire history; Selection (genetic algorithm); Function (biology); Change detection; Constant (computer programming); Computer science; Identification (biology); Climate change; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Bayesian probability; Ecology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007916797,0.00008728144,0.000130538,0.00005349326,0.000192261,0.00005719486,0.0002521274,0.00003659817,0.001341179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002346522,0.00006074117,0.00003628691,0.0001018046,0.0002354122,0.0007220164,0.0000103658,0.0001779387,0.0000310945],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009829715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002394635,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04075346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06555726,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989798,0.0001422928,0.000440874,0.00005418499,0.0001825986,0.0002002508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990747,0.0001468556,0.0004543269,0.0001392336,0.00004535523,0.0001395153],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004392187,0.00001324353,0.3565927,0.0002870276,0.00009842069,0.0002072382,0.04446364,0.001934747,0.0009728224,0.0005293595,0.03501288,0.559844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001308987,0.0005183487,0.5977344,0.001702305,0.0002996622,0.002466932,0.004490667,0.2947383,0.0001999208,0.006662402,0.08899432,0.0008838329],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940787,0.0003302782,0.002799383,0.0002814604,0.001530298,0.0002032605,0.0001277963,0.000002956675,0.0006458607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994978,0.0000297202,0.004559197,0.000277057,0.00008785763,0.000001780007,0.000003718379,0.000009579457,0.0000531428],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5589602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995717,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02931802792167048,"score_gpt":0.2161548385637969,"score_spread":0.1868368106421265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}