{"id":"W1971616252","doi":"10.4018/ijssci.2013010103","title":"The Cognitive Process and Formal Models of Human Attentions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Software Science and Computational Intelligence","topic":"Cognitive Computing and Networks","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Computer science; Cognition; Cognitive computing; Cognitive robotics; Process (computing); Perception; Cognitive science; Consciousness; Cognitive model; Artificial intelligence; Human–computer interaction; Rational analysis; Embodied cognition; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008977928,0.00009300653,0.000113517,0.0002133199,0.0004530171,0.0004240879,0.001009389,0.000022689,0.000004409501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003609056,0.00006665644,0.00004393591,0.0003726556,0.0008406951,0.001960713,0.0003308828,0.0001590463,0.000002186788],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002653173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002500862,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001363459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001928149,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981836,0.0000298109,0.0004442361,0.0001891928,0.0009710955,0.0001820642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992433,0.000720923,0.000379204,0.00006520152,0.006297697,0.0001039738],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001864011,0.0001001373,0.00213872,0.00001062728,0.0000775159,0.00001003785,0.001705228,0.01812668,0.0001070388,0.108823,0.00006805826,0.8688143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002081459,0.0002536262,0.01988249,0.0002725146,0.00001018478,0.0004140821,0.0008745554,0.4418829,0.0007816404,0.535257,0.00001415505,0.0001486211],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2182437,0.0002917012,0.7804255,0.0005573947,0.0002465983,0.00007636641,0.000001875811,0.0000108109,0.0001461029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912146,0.00007843062,0.008445811,0.0001779554,0.00006079982,0.000003992341,6.854939e-7,0.000002841851,0.00001485319],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8686657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.408949,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02699072189820172,"score_gpt":0.3204896401720948,"score_spread":0.2934989182738931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}