{"id":"W1971626598","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.01.002","title":"Reassessment of the Tiebout model","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Local Government Finance and Decentralization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Tiebout model; Fiscal federalism; Economics; Normative; Federalism; Point (geometry); Public economics; State (computer science); Competition (biology); Government (linguistics); Macroeconomics; Neoclassical economics; Decentralization; Public good; Politics; Law; Political science; Market economy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007192144,0.00003150295,0.00008858954,0.00002252099,0.00006775583,0.00002374414,0.0002640985,0.00003686413,0.00007862841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006886959,0.00002235608,0.00007776287,0.00005642549,0.00007373295,0.0003906043,0.00002444141,0.00005412552,0.000001417334],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001561229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004697008,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005942132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001518864,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994313,0.00004273593,0.0002710166,0.00003602435,0.0001169525,0.0001020462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992583,0.00001382303,0.0004948403,0.00008109595,0.00009917554,0.00005274396],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000875496,0.00009568569,0.07765767,0.000002678855,0.00002322828,2.349147e-7,0.003986651,0.000197782,0.000005833481,0.9056007,0.001858038,0.01056274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001782015,0.0002522113,0.4327688,0.00007780507,0.0001095229,0.000009774481,0.01167742,0.009142356,0.00112014,0.4126708,0.1299947,0.000394481],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8797784,0.00004608461,0.005639781,0.001932473,0.0005573243,0.00006676052,0.000002812128,0.00000292779,0.1119734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998263,0.0004411482,0.0005966959,0.0001614483,0.00007506604,3.375931e-7,9.239382e-8,0.000002787948,0.0004594461],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4929299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09116543,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1207281446785279,"score_gpt":0.2805408642623818,"score_spread":0.1598127195838539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}