{"id":"W1971678816","doi":"10.3986/ags52203","title":"Evaluation of Public Participation in Environmental Assessment Policies: The Case of Slovenia and Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta geographica Slovenica","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Space (punctuation); Politics; Process (computing); Public participation; Environmental policy; Environmental planning; Public policy; Political science; Environmental impact assessment; Regional science; Public space; Power (physics); Public administration; Environmental resource management; Sociology; Geography; Engineering; Economics; Computer science; Architectural engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01846754,0.0004194569,0.0006995501,0.002376973,0.007929235,0.008596171,0.001664778,0.001811215,0.003000717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02995573,0.0003742167,0.0005871393,0.004567313,0.004789841,0.001955435,0.004531812,0.001631465,0.0001621291],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09050791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09952785,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9326061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9250011,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9744788,0.01244902,0.0007255374,0.001043341,0.004223658,0.007079565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9768533,0.01226605,0.001059138,0.0009876684,0.007187623,0.001646269],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003394109,0.002178418,0.2219875,0.001735534,0.0007012386,0.008523619,0.1865774,0.09990094,0.003089691,0.2414375,0.01308706,0.217387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007394979,0.0009983935,0.2882858,0.001184846,0.0005903601,0.0005855497,0.5142254,0.05041796,0.005272318,0.01405213,0.123315,0.0003327996],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.956,0.0004295864,0.0007397966,0.001358371,0.00001468536,0.0002732503,0.0001448174,0.00002167121,0.0410178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996917,0.000150926,0.0005390026,0.00007828152,0.000001969411,0.00006852826,0.00006374708,0.000006805319,0.002173667],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9094921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6566839,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02400740322142935,"score_gpt":0.310439712339813,"score_spread":0.2864323091183836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}