{"id":"W1971858229","doi":"10.1177/082957350301800102","title":"Testing Competing Structural Models of Approaches to Learning in a Sample of Undergraduate Students: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of School Psychology","topic":"Evaluation of Teaching Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Confirmatory factor analysis; Goodness of fit; Structural equation modeling; Test (biology); Sample (material); Mathematics education; Reliability (semiconductor); Consistency (knowledge bases); Factor analysis; Item analysis; Psychometrics; Social psychology; Applied psychology; Developmental psychology; Statistics; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003876764,0.00009603198,0.0003990963,0.001068925,0.000185904,0.0000492067,0.0004415903,0.00008429584,0.0001554907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01084757,0.0001003148,0.00009709835,0.001053379,0.0001705755,0.0003580975,0.000009955914,0.0004908715,0.000001819058],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001973228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001257666,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03074335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1195233,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967691,0.001629608,0.0007317483,0.0001554152,0.0004154197,0.0002987008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973054,0.0008573965,0.0009494802,0.0001266396,0.0003006021,0.0004605083],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001232989,0.00001468488,0.9537209,0.000007161303,0.0001747242,0.000006110097,0.008774093,0.03168497,0.00008866817,0.004763606,0.00002009827,0.0007326991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001021745,0.0002351765,0.9621745,0.0001216248,0.0002176383,0.00001495874,0.0233182,0.0009214939,0.00002238177,0.01066557,0.001045902,0.0002407579],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922389,0.0001589829,0.002148845,0.002491129,0.0001610908,0.0001167558,0.00000616402,0.000004248629,0.002673819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896346,0.000003845758,0.01016831,0.0001340058,0.00003103378,0.000001259556,7.297203e-7,0.000008064851,0.00001809632],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08877996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974845,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.405819735383028,"score_gpt":0.4542581892696856,"score_spread":0.04843845388665763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}