{"id":"W1971858229","doi":"10.1177/082957350301800102","title":"Testing Competing Structural Models of Approaches to Learning in a Sample of Undergraduate Students: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of School Psychology","topic":"Evaluation of Teaching Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Confirmatory factor analysis; Goodness of fit; Structural equation modeling; Test (biology); Sample (material); Mathematics education; Reliability (semiconductor); Consistency (knowledge bases); Factor analysis; Item analysis; Psychometrics; Social psychology; Applied psychology; Developmental psychology; Statistics; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04166393,0.001433278,0.001158327,0.002179761,0.002066092,0.002842407,0.001437978,0.00098158,0.002397162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08275809,0.000951926,0.002883206,0.002015225,0.002309412,0.001639652,0.002042338,0.002242658,0.0003903898],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002330005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006542677,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01566569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0141694,"domain_scores_codex":[0.982231,0.008911425,0.001432769,0.001754615,0.004657989,0.001012213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9295244,0.04896889,0.003628829,0.006525482,0.009998798,0.001353658],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004789333,0.001220327,0.9278586,0.00009612511,0.0004214744,0.0001511851,0.02549697,0.001231937,0.002442835,0.002121746,0.0006118373,0.03786794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000324813,0.002572883,0.9039917,0.0001453266,0.0003689879,0.0003528324,0.0257528,0.05622476,0.003192692,0.004526197,0.002439592,0.0001073791],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940069,0.00002691878,0.00483158,0.00009374322,0.00001446822,0.0004417805,0.00009918893,0.00001627064,0.0004691687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899505,0.00003999006,0.00816335,0.00004828066,0.000009540677,0.0009514146,0.0005450899,0.00001522547,0.0002766724],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04166393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2203426,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.405819735383028,"score_gpt":0.4542581892696856,"score_spread":0.04843845388665763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}