{"id":"W1971937407","doi":"10.1016/j.ijar.2009.04.009","title":"A formal framework for description logics with uncertainty","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning","topic":"Semantic Web and Ontologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Soundness; Completeness (order theory); Computer science; Negation; Description logic; ENCODE; Feature (linguistics); Set (abstract data type); Theoretical computer science; Knowledge representation and reasoning; Ontology; Semantics (computer science); Knowledge base; Artificial intelligence; Programming language; Mathematics; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01126666,0.00168594,0.001981228,0.004627714,0.003128014,0.009456765,0.00559151,0.003074608,0.005877212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01640014,0.001942743,0.00557021,0.005268656,0.006780032,0.01643925,0.007747852,0.007212932,0.001402478],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004064488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003398891,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005845786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005246426,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9922896,0.002905506,0.001176745,0.0009967661,0.002112406,0.0005189184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876714,0.007741718,0.0007858163,0.001833657,0.001349695,0.0006177821],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001198316,0.00001682243,0.00004622055,0.00007312607,0.00002041165,0.00008142793,0.0001489183,0.004318382,0.0001833509,0.9864967,0.0008289965,0.007773676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002278537,0.00001204743,0.00002066942,0.00006038885,0.00003205525,0.00007783696,0.00006039139,0.02669263,0.0003067653,0.9609576,0.0117343,0.00002257548],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007733036,0.000500836,0.9946661,0.0009481994,0.00009811146,0.00007216135,0.0001799753,0.0002413163,0.002520016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07410432,0.001251687,0.919331,0.0007192876,0.0004889819,0.000491816,0.0006819209,0.0001733143,0.002757719],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01126666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0595845,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02437891769139504,"score_gpt":0.2885082667001654,"score_spread":0.2641293490087704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}