{"id":"W1971979814","doi":"10.1007/s100090200073","title":"Comparison of SPIN and VIS for protocol verification","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer","topic":"Formal Methods in Verification","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Asynchronous communication; Protocol (science); Theory of computation; Software; Formal verification; Software verification; Formal methods; Promela; Model checking; Communications protocol; Embedded system; Programming language; Computer network; Software system; Software construction","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005902524,0.0001287169,0.0002110085,0.0003807248,0.000106786,0.0001119126,0.0007845837,0.0001773937,0.000007106974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001067522,0.0001185167,0.00009751451,0.0001772819,0.0001004662,0.0005326098,0.00001707767,0.0002084983,0.000002054958],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007196656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006806659,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":2.65145e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.059576e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987451,0.00004358295,0.0005278438,0.0002508168,0.0002610419,0.000171588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987637,0.0002054718,0.0001573315,0.0002404097,0.0005916577,0.00004143798],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000172433,0.0001946307,0.001184741,0.00003140481,0.00006054126,7.526775e-7,0.0001157332,0.0000617398,0.004055078,0.7201539,0.0001174462,0.2738516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004761513,0.002618224,0.002122773,0.0001746014,0.00002955521,0.0002112509,0.0001013685,0.007430705,0.69201,0.09211581,0.1980089,0.0004153108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.008677611,0.00001745019,0.981458,0.0007488035,0.0004338152,0.00847549,0.00001983335,0.0001140245,0.00005498538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2038478,0.00000584899,0.7842453,0.0001043832,0.00003473344,0.01172475,0.000003901583,0.00001398758,0.00001931001],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.687955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4832973,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06635256689107977,"score_gpt":0.4103775650954806,"score_spread":0.3440249982044008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}