{"id":"W1972145896","doi":"10.1002/cjce.5450810108","title":"Peculiarities of the Thermodynamics of Electrolyte Solutions: A Critical Discussion","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","topic":"Chemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous Solutions","field":"Chemical Engineering","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Activity coefficient; Electrolyte; Thermodynamics; Ionic bonding; Gibbs free energy; Ion; Chemistry; Interpretation (philosophy); Solvent; Relation (database); Physical chemistry; Physics; Aqueous solution; Organic chemistry; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002266037,0.0001464652,0.000280591,0.00004720022,0.00008989557,0.00001279127,0.0004910565,0.0001076221,0.00005082621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001619376,0.0000738794,0.0002886509,0.0002658573,0.0003867451,0.00006599337,0.00003683785,0.0006682476,8.917045e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001817944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002862341,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002473816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003296454,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987656,0.00003153144,0.0004894429,0.00008299739,0.0002536249,0.0003767493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989645,0.0002683054,0.0001119438,0.0002560275,0.0001713123,0.0002279026],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000105711,0.00002843132,0.00001841497,0.00009057444,0.0000552484,0.000001615848,0.0002516964,0.01262285,0.8933399,0.09333467,0.0001050434,0.0001409494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002945229,0.00003509463,0.00001978538,0.0004133236,0.0001077446,0.0001546437,0.00004736853,0.05408723,0.9329543,0.01085584,0.0008139258,0.0002162807],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9667192,0.004137143,0.01731008,0.005469448,0.001065516,0.0003181964,0.00008124907,0.00004787547,0.004851282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994384,0.000003723694,0.0003654856,0.00002690167,0.00009440337,0.000002764519,6.155498e-7,0.00002147109,0.00004623129],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08247883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3012714,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00997529934076978,"score_gpt":0.1947606142149342,"score_spread":0.1847853148741644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}