{"id":"W1972195093","doi":"10.1007/s10255-008-8801-7","title":"Strong consistency of the empirical martingale simulation option price estimator","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Mathematicae Applicatae Sinica English Series","topic":"Stochastic processes and financial applications","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Martingale (probability theory); Estimator; Monte Carlo method; Consistency (knowledge bases); Lipschitz continuity; Univariate; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Econometrics; Applied mathematics; Economics; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02533771,0.0009885116,0.002251081,0.002564336,0.0009150748,0.004069363,0.004089485,0.003159228,0.005377241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1676753,0.001612119,0.001941832,0.001493804,0.005404482,0.006195497,0.004737461,0.005689478,0.0009044864],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001017495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002108559,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009713688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005770013,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9899035,0.005262378,0.0005755551,0.001978265,0.001782993,0.0004974343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8235031,0.1427011,0.008122407,0.01223242,0.0112712,0.002169704],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004810167,0.0001631049,0.01086703,0.0002645217,0.0003932456,0.0003839819,0.0002269559,0.1117949,0.00427237,0.8532302,0.001729621,0.01619291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001027527,0.0000902124,0.003179753,0.00008752345,0.00005569817,0.0002785422,0.00003404072,0.5799764,0.002472019,0.4125586,0.001098236,0.00006625002],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09134965,0.0005102535,0.9001551,0.001595761,0.0001841528,0.00008063183,0.0003051157,0.0003522035,0.00546706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8792064,0.0005931177,0.1116452,0.000660748,0.0004691072,0.0002663166,0.001199024,0.0004087661,0.005551204],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02533771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1340002,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06933078192930239,"score_gpt":0.2854683485839189,"score_spread":0.2161375666546165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}