{"id":"W1972215948","doi":"10.1007/s10551-006-9073-x","title":"An Examination of the Structure of Executive Compensation and Corporate Social Responsibility: A Canadian Investigation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Business Ethics","topic":"Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":271,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate social responsibility; Executive compensation; Salary; Strengths and weaknesses; Business ethics; Accounting; Business; Compensation (psychology); Public relations; Corporate governance; Political science; Psychology; Finance; Law; Social psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006018967,0.0003919231,0.0005869807,0.006737442,0.02387248,0.005996534,0.00260825,0.001386947,0.006652453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04015464,0.0007913434,0.0005208607,0.01342355,0.01028824,0.003031937,0.003101578,0.002799147,0.0002449551],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.3054427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3490402,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9985896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995137,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99358,0.001166349,0.0001450077,0.0004609306,0.002761902,0.001885856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.968284,0.00916026,0.002767882,0.000765183,0.01565255,0.003370127],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006019354,0.0003612393,0.3424387,0.0003152859,0.0001043633,0.001006022,0.1496537,0.002315339,0.001765493,0.3973377,0.02048573,0.08361447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001186386,0.00009687782,0.8012559,0.0003173097,0.0001302632,0.0002550989,0.1232769,0.003181871,0.0006830584,0.01463103,0.05586758,0.0001855385],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8341399,0.00189156,0.001012717,0.0166358,0.00004552042,0.0002065798,0.0007885198,0.00002413312,0.1452553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883711,0.0008995354,0.0007280853,0.0005336907,0.00000950823,0.00003751418,0.000151211,0.00001472993,0.00925447],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3054427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8055881,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06808267891195473,"score_gpt":0.2715022549976813,"score_spread":0.2034195760857266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}