{"id":"W1972232770","doi":"10.1002/jae.1224","title":"When Kahneman meets Manski: Using dual systems of reasoning to interpret subjective expectations of equity returns","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Econometrics","topic":"Financial Markets and Investment Strategies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología; Universitat de Barcelona; Université Laval","keywords":"Sketch; Economics; Dual (grammatical number); Equity (law); Econometrics; Simple (philosophy); Actuarial science; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001285855,0.0001919993,0.0009126583,0.001870315,0.00007402938,0.00009438664,0.000375937,0.0001562614,0.0001288252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005297843,0.0002089379,0.0002042356,0.0008738698,0.00009970107,0.0004180666,0.000134281,0.0003371333,0.00001130983],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000160589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009993988,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001306199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003194303,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975604,0.00001184796,0.001780618,0.0002679453,0.000100957,0.0002782772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971786,0.0001993744,0.0019614,0.0003022578,0.0002026654,0.0001556779],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002165243,0.0002952777,0.01615839,0.000198838,0.0003021398,0.000006044121,0.006424232,0.001961225,0.005011762,0.9679679,0.0005537011,0.0009039945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01023645,0.006247884,0.3336999,0.001537042,0.0006247045,0.0004103281,0.05368247,0.02179275,0.04263167,0.5005175,0.02364449,0.004974813],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9434846,0.0008419033,0.002366645,0.00006210536,0.001208607,0.0002652676,0.0001380246,0.000007216258,0.0516256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902032,0.00009463914,0.009413382,0.00002775656,0.0001994367,0.000006833233,0.000002925644,0.00002640036,0.00002540104],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4674504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8520241,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04612736372084098,"score_gpt":0.2603991884974109,"score_spread":0.21427182477657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}