{"id":"W1972281289","doi":"10.1080/10427710120049264","title":"Where Else Would you Look? Constructivism and the Historiography of Economics","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Historiography; Epistemology; Conversation; Naturalism; Philosophy of science; Knight; Constructivism (international relations); Relevance (law); Social science; Sociology; Positive economics; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Politics; Economics; International relations","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006724699,0.0004055081,0.0004358089,0.003668924,0.003848003,0.009636206,0.0007976293,0.002314091,0.002608745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0090552,0.000357158,0.0002988863,0.005598949,0.05180373,0.01424087,0.002077354,0.006123446,0.00030614],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01536316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004996404,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009793277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006904479,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954786,0.003497884,0.00007535594,0.0002657117,0.0004368704,0.0002457033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917863,0.006398114,0.0005044976,0.0004793594,0.0005360916,0.0002956251],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008286085,0.000007595962,0.0003191239,0.00004247676,0.00000503033,0.0000214717,0.01088585,0.0001944085,0.00001905662,0.9783086,0.004214355,0.005973761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009442839,0.000008688637,0.0005326663,0.0004251055,0.000004972355,0.00003284992,0.008372828,0.0003163127,0.00005211219,0.8749894,0.1152463,0.000009237951],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05641396,0.2820957,0.02259663,0.3767528,0.002929692,0.00003383501,0.0001264885,0.0001065792,0.2589444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8868724,0.07974087,0.00494324,0.01094065,0.001812238,0.00007039556,0.00005831368,0.000136099,0.01542576],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.996152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1114681,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02703233134361703,"score_gpt":0.1869493473815308,"score_spread":0.1599170160379138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}