{"id":"W1972281289","doi":"10.1080/10427710120049264","title":"Where Else Would you Look? Constructivism and the Historiography of Economics","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Historiography; Epistemology; Conversation; Naturalism; Philosophy of science; Knight; Constructivism (international relations); Relevance (law); Social science; Sociology; Positive economics; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Politics; Economics; International relations","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006705461,0.0001367325,0.0004521646,0.0001794127,0.0002056794,0.00001520823,0.0005944776,0.00006362086,0.0003666807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001765064,0.00008749092,0.0003940651,0.0000189141,0.004450219,0.0004176184,0.00005737616,0.0003250035,0.00000405676],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000485425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002501479,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008866144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002650377,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989273,0.00007214633,0.0006682066,0.0001267718,0.00007870086,0.0001268697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979698,0.00009339529,0.001501584,0.0002971753,0.00007795385,0.0000601062],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007640308,0.0001061224,0.001449238,0.00007233898,0.000256483,0.000003924941,0.03214416,0.0001566809,0.0002821389,0.9261852,0.03574067,0.002839006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009865692,0.00008407883,0.0001580413,0.00004990215,0.00009039042,0.00007414685,0.0007194287,0.00003055302,0.00002354888,0.02383216,0.9738432,0.0001080023],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7190752,0.03092074,0.000006157305,0.003757148,0.01546497,0.0001806885,0.00002664064,0.000008392853,0.2305601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.976146,0.001867527,0.0001065048,0.0002828502,0.0009454421,0.00000156529,1.534364e-7,0.00001625344,0.02063365],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9381025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982591,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02703233134361703,"score_gpt":0.1869493473815308,"score_spread":0.1599170160379138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}