{"id":"W1972317298","doi":"10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.11.019","title":"A rational quantitative approach to determine the best dosing regimen for a target therapeutic effect: A unified formalism for antibiotic evaluation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Biology","topic":"Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Dosing; Formalism (music); Regimen; Antibiotics; Medicine; Intensive care medicine; Pharmacology; Applied mathematics; Mathematics; Internal medicine; Biology; Microbiology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004985951,0.001525531,0.002485328,0.001415426,0.001149756,0.003844682,0.00328626,0.002222024,0.004446125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01067452,0.001125381,0.001944476,0.001032112,0.003316857,0.004857339,0.001875137,0.003540358,0.0008242712],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003059876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003252853,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003656652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002723213,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979663,0.0008586936,0.0001455701,0.000215603,0.0006825075,0.0001313639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972143,0.001730083,0.0002297593,0.0002747875,0.0004470755,0.000104015],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002153838,0.00005275468,0.0001661599,0.0001362904,0.0000540388,0.00008342605,0.00009945798,0.2387234,0.002006177,0.7474408,0.0017275,0.009488519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001761881,0.00003104739,0.00006143398,0.00002915923,0.00002590265,0.00003142703,0.00002038749,0.5810527,0.0003733953,0.4164887,0.001842843,0.00002539811],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002187137,0.0003271324,0.9898638,0.001193798,0.00008588077,0.0000594183,0.00009554742,0.00007563767,0.006111537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3204646,0.001775673,0.6652901,0.001528344,0.0005156643,0.000724668,0.0002202641,0.0003330757,0.009147712],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004985951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02636856,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06302026408066567,"score_gpt":0.3899364669639019,"score_spread":0.3269162028832363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}