{"id":"W1972490689","doi":"10.1007/s11069-011-0082-4","title":"Buildings’ seismic vulnerability assessment methods: a comparative study","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Natural Hazards","topic":"Seismic Performance and Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Federal Emergency Management Agency","keywords":"Vulnerability (computing); Vulnerability assessment; Risk assessment; Analytic hierarchy process; Seismic risk; Seismic hazard; Weighting; Computer science; Natural hazard; Risk analysis (engineering); Hazard; Civil engineering; Construction engineering; Engineering; Operations research; Geography; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008296006,0.0002080178,0.0003624891,0.0001067428,0.0001069922,0.00003492095,0.0001791104,0.00006206951,0.0000942663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001617139,0.0001677165,0.0001177571,0.0003776892,0.00002986569,0.0004216546,0.00004868665,0.000496818,0.00004528673],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002207066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001858008,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004078973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000531145,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987956,0.0001283677,0.0002558025,0.0001750969,0.0002503588,0.0003948333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994467,0.00008397684,0.00003420635,0.0002740137,0.00005676827,0.0001043392],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006542803,0.001680627,0.1777749,0.0002281545,0.002834907,0.00001135082,0.02269219,0.0770493,0.0268869,0.000383269,0.0239358,0.6664572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007437196,0.00009071858,0.1128519,0.0000182532,0.0002154116,0.000009435827,0.003693489,0.8516792,0.007553201,0.0001051138,0.02245618,0.0005834372],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9839883,0.001156853,0.01112833,0.00005058775,0.0008027758,0.0002079331,0.00000482997,0.0002655617,0.002394858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895697,0.00001470654,0.009846909,0.0001324629,0.00025153,0.00003955429,0.000009365951,0.00001570706,0.0001201035],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7746299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.683928,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02920464696676425,"score_gpt":0.3792945754263248,"score_spread":0.3500899284595606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}